2008-07-29

maeve66: (Default)
2008-07-29 08:05 am
Entry tags:

Whoa, Nellie!

[livejournal.com profile] mudpriestess is right! I totally forgot one of the most enjoyable things I did after coming out here, which was going to Arlington Race Track with her.

I love horse racing. I have loved it since I was 8 and my dad took us to see Secretariat run, twice, in 1974, in Arlington, and also in Saratoga, New York. Since I was in my early 20s, I have also loved BETTING on horse races. I have a system, for lack of a better word: I go by whether the horse's name gives me some synchronicitous jolt. Any kind of a thematic coincidence works. On Saturday when [livejournal.com profile] mudpriestess and I went, the theme I was thinking of was "anything vaguely militaristic", because I'd been on an hour-long call with M. the night before. He called at 3:56 AM and I went out to the back yard and talked until 5 AM. I promised to put some money on a few horses for him. His own system would be more based on Charles Bukowski's, I think.

Anyway, my system goes: relevance of name; then a secondary level of names, given in the horse's ancestry; then if I recognize the jockey, or if the jockey is an apprentice (because they tend to win a lot, being even tinier and lighter and hot shit), or if the jockey is a woman, simply out of gender solidarity; then the actual odds on the horse; then if the horse is grey, because I think greys are gorgeous... and one guy who trained horses told M. and I that we should look for dappling in the hide, because that indicates good condition. If I can, I prefer to make all my bets first (since all they rely on is the names, and I can see that beforehand) and then relax and enjoy the races.

So. [livejournal.com profile] mudpriestess had never gone to the races before, and it was extraordinarily fun, once we figured out all our bets. I think it is fair to say that she adopted my highly scientific betting system. And she won BIG -- as "big" is defined in my terms, which means better than breaking even. Seriously, though, $70 total. Given that we made the minimum bets for the most part -- $2 per wager -- that's damn good.

Horses that I won on included (actually, these were bets made for M.): "Off Duty" (EXCELLENT name, given the circumstances) and "Spy Park", which is also relevant.* Hm. And then there were two favorites that came in, at the end, for both [livejournal.com profile] mudpriestess and I. God. Who were those two? "Rocket Rodd" or something like that. And ... what? What was the other one in that late race, [livejournal.com profile] mudpriestess?

The whole afternoon was fun. The beer was good. We paid for reserved seats so we'd be out of the sun, and that was worth it. I'd do it again in a hot second. And I want to go to Golden Gate Fields when the season starts there, again.

*Okay, full disclosure: I also lost on "Sergeant Carter", and if we hadn't missed the first two races, I would have bet and lost on "Sgt. Master Commander". And I lost on "Fort Prado", too. So the military theme didn't, perhaps, procure the BEST results. But still, I enjoyed those two wins.