sabotabby: two lisa frank style kittens with a zizek quote (trash can of ideology)
sabotabby ([personal profile] sabotabby) wrote2025-05-21 07:24 pm
Entry tags:

L&O season 2: Episode 10

The finale was...good, actually? Again, grading on a curve. It is still a bad show. But it's one of those bad shows where you get the sense that there is someone in the writers' room doing their best and sneaking all kinds of fun content in (see also: Archie singing IWW songs in Riverdale).

I had to check Reddit to see which case this was based on—it takes most of the episode to get to it. A seemingly unremarkable middle-aged travel agent drops dead in his driveway while his wife is out for a jog. It looks like a heart attack, but a cop in 44 Division suggests to Holness that she might want to get "her best" on it. Unfortunately the best that Toronto Police Services—sorry, TPD on the show for some reason—have are Graff and Bateman.

spoilers )

And that's a wrap. I guess I'll have to find some good show to watch now.
sabotabby: (books!)
sabotabby ([personal profile] sabotabby) wrote2025-05-21 07:20 am
Entry tags:

Reading Wednesday

 Just finished: The Ministry of Time by Kaliane Bradley. I don't know what to make of this, and will definitely be checking out the Wizards vs. Lesbians episode on it (not that I always agree with them, but they do raise perspectives that are interesting). I would say overall the prose and characters carried it. I got to know these people, I fell in love with them in the same way that the narrator did. It was compelling, as the kids say.

But I don't think the ended quite landed and I'm struggling to think of why. In part (and this is confirmed a little in an interview that follows the book), it's hurt a bit by the first-person narration. Bradley is telling a much bigger story than the narrator sees, and while that thankfully rescues it from being a didactic Message Book, it might have swung too far towards the other direction where I'm not exactly sure what it was trying to say. It's one of those books that straddles the literary and genre, and I tend to prefer genre in a literary style than literary fiction exploring genre. 

That said, it was so relentlessly well-written that I feel like my ill-defined issues with it are kind of irrelevant because I highly enjoyed it.

Currently reading: Bad Cree by Jessica Johns. I'm almost done this one. It's almost the reverse—protagonists figuring out genre solutions to literary fiction problems. I was given a warning about this book and I'm yet to figure out why.

What Feasts At Night by T. Kingfisher. I didn't read the first novella in this series (What Moves the Dead) despite it having my favourite cover the year it came out. So it's taking some getting used to. On the plus side, the opening is suffused with so much gothic horror that I find myself turning into a young woman fleeing in a white gown across the moors, holding a candlestick.
sabotabby: (books!)
sabotabby ([personal profile] sabotabby) wrote2025-05-16 07:19 am
Entry tags:

podcast friday

 I hear some of you like podcasts and some of you also like books so why not have a podcast about a very good book that you can pre-order now. The latest episode of Wizards & Spaceships, "Blight ft. Rachel A. Rosen," celebrates not just the beginning of the podcast's second season (!!!) but the release of. Well. Tentacled queer magical Canadian anti-fascist fantasy. And the trials and travails of bringing such creative pursuits into reality. So go check it out (preferably on an app and not on the website), like, subscribe, share, etc.
sabotabby: (books!)
sabotabby ([personal profile] sabotabby) wrote2025-05-14 07:19 am
Entry tags:

Reading Wednesday

Just finished: Someone You Can Build a Nest In by John Wiswell. Sometimes people ask me, Sabs, why do you keep reading books that you hate? When you encounter a phrase, like say, "allosexual virgins," in a passage set in a medieval fantasyland and you know you are not going to vote for this book to win the Hugo, why not DNF? Well, Dear Reader, it's so that I can rant about how Big Mad I got reading this and how it typifies why I nearly always despise cozy fiction and queernormative fantasy settings.

spoilers and ranting )

Okay glad that's expelled. Onwards.

Currently reading: Bad Cree by Jessica Johns. This otoh avoids all the pitfalls you would expect in a story where the main character is guided by dreams and visions, and none of the characters around her disbelieve her. Largely because it's dreamy and literary and so embedded in Cree culture, so the conflict is not "are the dreams real? Is any of this happening to her?" but "did she abandon her family in the time of their greatest need."

The Ministry of Time by Kaliane Bradley. This was a very hyped book that's also up for a Hugo, and I am liking it a lot more so far. The British government somehow gets time travel technology and experiments with it by dragging people who would have otherwise died in history (a member of the Franklin Expedition, a WWI soldier, a plague victim, and someone from the French Revolution) into the present day. Each "expat" is assigned to a "bridge," someone who can explain the modern world and help them assimilate. Our heroine is a Cambodian-British civil servant assigned to the Franklin Expedition guy, who falls in love with him. There's a lot about race and colonialism here, as well as the kind of baseline British bureaucracy satire that I tend to enjoy; this one is pretty good so far. Even though I'm annoyed b/c I started writing a story like this and thought the concept was too silly to continue.
sabotabby: two lisa frank style kittens with a zizek quote (trash can of ideology)
sabotabby ([personal profile] sabotabby) wrote2025-05-13 07:12 pm
Entry tags:

L&O season 2: Episode 9

 Did you miss these? I've been busy with life and watching Andor.

Okay finally finally Law & Order Toronto is tackling Barry and Honey Sherman, which I have been looking forward to since they announced the show. It also tackled the Ontario Science Centre closure by the Ford government. The former crime is unsolved; the latter is out in the open despite Doug Ford still wandering around a free man somehow.

Anyway, the problem is once again that the actual cases are both more interesting than the plot we get here.

A pharma CEO and his philanthropist wife are murdered in what at first looks like a murder-suicide but isn't. With the company's sale to a larger company pending, there are a lot of potential suspects. She's also posed to look like a painting that she overpaid for at an auction, and that her best friend/interior designer wanted but couldn't afford. The designer, as well as the pharma CEO's brother, both have a decent motive to kill her. On top of that, she was on the board for the Ontario Science Centre, which a developer wanted to close in order to build luxury condos on it.

The killer is the designer's husband, and his motivation was that the developer bribed him to get rid of the philanthropist, who was only one holding out against the sale. Yawn. So really none of the reasons why the Shermans' murder is interesting, and none of the reasons why the closure of the OSC is criminal rather than simply corrupt.

Plot: ** (loses one point for each case that it's less interesting than)
Characters: * (Graff tries to ask Bateman out on a date and then fumbles the pass by also inviting her daughter)
Toronto: *** (Some good Toronto content, including a beautiful shot of Nathan Phillips Square and City Hall, a Sick Kids auction, and the controversies surrounding development in Don Mills. I'm less sure about the locations of the two houses and in general I don't know enough about rich people taste to be able to tell. Someone needs to invite me to the Bridal Path for research purposes)

Murder count: 12, not including the murder of the Ontario Science Centre and the happiness of many generations of children. The 2025 murder rate in Toronto remains at 11, so TORONTO'S WAR ON CRIME is officially more violent on the show than in real life.
sabotabby: (doom doom doom)
sabotabby ([personal profile] sabotabby) wrote2025-05-09 07:27 am
Entry tags:

podcast friday

 I'm once again lagging behind on podcasts, not in the least because ICHH is reviewing Andor episodes faster than I can watch any TV show, and also I have negative amounts of time in May. But anyway, my pick for the week is their episode "Who We Talk About When We Talk About Borders.

Lost in the discussion about "hey is it bad to deport little children with brain cancer?" and "is it constitutional to offshore a concentration camp?" is the fact that the border is part of land that does not belong to the US. I mean, none of the US belongs to the US any more than Canada or Mexico is a real thing. This episode focuses on the damage done to Indigenous communities whose traditional territory encompasses both sides of the imaginary line, and the horrors they face, from harassment by the regime's Gestapo, to grave desecration, to environmental war crimes. It also looks at the differing news coverage under the Biden and Trump regimes, and how the plight of both migrants and Indigenous communities can be ignored when it's inconvenient for media to cover.
microbie: (Default)
microbie ([personal profile] microbie) wrote2025-05-08 11:44 pm

argh

Once again I had several paragraphs written that were wiped out and apparently not recoverable. I should really write these in an autosaving word processor program. Dammit. Anyway, here are the bullet points:
  • Microbes had the planet to themselves for three billion years. I think we should give it back to them.
  • Avoiding the news is a matter of survival.
  • I have hope, just not in people.
  • I added two native plants to the backyard: a shrub, Viburnum nudum, and a vine, Lonicera sempervirens. My favorite common name for the shrub is possumhaw; the vine is often called trumpet honeysuckle.

Shrub
IMG_9470

Vine
IMG_9469