maeve66: (Daoism)
maeve66 ([personal profile] maeve66) wrote2012-10-14 04:58 pm
Entry tags:

Day 324: "Cheating on Tests" and "History or English"

Those were two topics that came up on the random topic generator, one after the other. Both education topics, which is fitting enough because I am finding it very, very hard to focus on lesson planning, this evening. Bah.

Cheating on tests... bugs me. I mean, I feel like it's one of those things that hurts the perpetrator, but that the perpetrator doesn't care that he or she has not actually learned those things, or else he or she would not cheat in the first place. If he or she doesn't CARE about learning, how can someone else possibly "make" them care? This expresses a good portion of my ambivalence about teaching. I can try to make a subject interesting, I can try to make learning an often enjoyable process, I myself enjoy some of what I teach (see next subject, or perhaps it should be tomorrow's topic?)... but if a kid is determined not to learn, for whatever reason*, how can I force him or her? I wonder if there are experiments out there about removing grades as an issue, and of course standardized tests, and seeing how students reacted to learning for learning's sake?

*reasons which obviously can include the fact that somehow, for some set of reasons, learning skills in school has ALWAYS been difficult and therefore not enjoyable for some students, and that they associate reading and writing with failure and boredom and lack of enjoyment, as well as shame and associated rejection. How do you get someone to move beyond that experience, especially when their basic skills are so low that getting information from reading is excruciatingly difficult for them. Yes, you can try to use other means for getting information across, and I do, but at the end of the day, there is still going to be necessary reading and writing.

PS, unrelated, I am finally making greater headway through Barbara Kingsolver's The Lacuna, having reached the Diego Rivera/Frida Kahlo/Leon Trotsky portion of the book. Also, I finished her Animal, Vegetable, Miracle, which did bother me -- I skipped all of her husband's pedantic mini-essays and the daughter's self-approving anecdotes -- but I tried to take in some of it without sneering at the freedoms which allowed her to "live off the land" and reduce her carbon footprint, etc. I note she and her husband did fly to Italy during the year, to do some farm tourism.
ironed_orchid: watercolour and pen style sketch of a brown tabby cat curl up with her head looking up at the viewer and her front paw stretched out on the left (Default)

[personal profile] ironed_orchid 2012-10-15 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
My former boss and I did an online carbon footprint test, and we were both doing great until we got to air travel. I was also annoyed with the lack of distinction between types of red meat, because while cows do contribute to greenhouse effect, kangaroo not so much. (It was a test on an Australian govt. site, although it's possible that they bought the test ready made.)

Often I think the problem with cheating on tests is the focus schools place on tests and test results. They make the stakes seem so high that even people who would probably do okay are tempted to cheat to avoid test taking panic.

One of the nice things about teaching at uni was that I was theoretically teaching adults and could treat them like adults. So my general advice was do revision in the week leading to the test, get a good night's sleep, and don't drink more coffee than usual because it can make you jittery and need to pee, neither of which are conducive to sitting in an exam room.